REHABCOVID - Organisation of respiratory rehabilitation in post-COVID-19 patients with sequelae. Evaluation and therapeutic indication for remote rehabilitation vs. conventional rehabilitation.
Head :
Vallier Jean-Marc
Last update : 04/20/2021 | Version : 1 | ID : 73830
| General | |
| Identification | |
| Detailed name | Organisation of respiratory rehabilitation in post-COVID-19 patients with sequelae. Evaluation and therapeutic indication for remote rehabilitation vs. conventional rehabilitation. |
| Sign or acronym | REHABCOVID |
| General Aspects | |
| Medical area |
Pneumology |
| Study in connection with Covid-19 |
Yes |
| Scientific investigator(s) (Contact) | |
| Name of the director | Vallier |
| Surname | Jean-Marc |
| Collaborations | |
| Funding | |
| Governance of the database | |
| Sponsor(s) or organisation(s) responsible | Toulon Intermunicipal Hospital - La Seyne sur Mer |
| Organisation status |
Public |
| Additional contact | |
| ASMAA.JOBIC@ch-toulon.fr | |
| Main features | |
| Type of database | |
| Type of database |
Others |
| Database objective | |
| Main objective | Compare the efficacy of two respiratory rehabilitation methods on patient physical capacity: a 4-week remote respiratory rehabilitation (RRR) programme vs. a conventional respiratory rehabilitation (RR) programme, for reducing sequelae present in post-COVID-19 patients. |
| Inclusion criteria |
1. Subjects aged over 18 years.
2. Subjects having contracted COVID-19 determined by a positive RT-PCR test and/or presence of antibodies. 3. Subjects having received a medical prescription for respiratory rehabilitation. 4. Subjects equipped with the necessary computer equipment and network coverage for videoconferencing. 5. Subjects with at least one of the following post-COVID-19 sequelae: - Dyspnoea at rest or on exertion measured using the mMRC (modified Medical Research Council) scale, with a score greater than or equal to 2. (Vestbo et al., 2013) - Hyperventilation measured using the Nijmegen questionnaire, with a score greater than or equal to 23/64 (Van Dixhoorn and Duivenvoorden, 1985; Sauty and Prosper, 2008) - Exercise intolerance measured using the 1 min-STS (1-minute sit-to-stand test) according to the standards based on age and gender, established by Strassmann et al. (2013). - Abnormal fatigue measured using the MFI-20 (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory), French-language version validated by Gentile et al. (2003) according to the standards based on age and gender, established by Schwarz et al. (2003). - Anxiety and depression status measured using the HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale), French-language version validated by Roberge et al. (2013) according to the standards based on age and gender, established by Bocéréan and Ducret (2014) 6. Registered with or a beneficiary of a social security scheme. |
| Population type | |
| Age |
Adulthood (19 to 24 years) Adulthood (25 to 44 years) Adulthood (45 to 64 years) Elderly (65 to 79 years) Great age (80 years and more) |
| Population covered |
Sick population |
| Pathology | X - Diseases of the respiratory system |
| Gender |
Male Woman |
| Geography area |
Regional |
| French regions covered by the database |
Provence - Alpes - Côte d'Azur |
| Data collection | |
| Dates | |
| Size of the database | |
| Size of the database (number of individuals) |
< 500 individuals |
| Details of the number of individuals | 118 subjects (59 patients in the RR group and 59 patients in the RRR group) |
| Data | |
| Type of data collected |
Clinical data Declarative data Paraclinical data |
| Procedures | |
| Followed pathology | |
| Promotion and access | |
| Promotion | |
| Access |
